Verifiability is the first standard on RADIX Wiki: the threshold for including material is whether readers can check that it comes from a reliable, published source – not whether an editor is personally convinced it is true.[1] Any statement likely to be challenged, and every quotation, should carry an inline citation to a source.
Reliable sources
Prefer primary Radix documentation, the project's own repositories, peer-reviewed papers, and the on-chain record. The Radix ledger is itself a primary source: an asset supply, a component's state, or a transaction can be cited directly via the Gateway API or a ledger explorer.[2] Marketing copy and unattributed forum posts are weak sources and should be replaced.
Maintenance banners
Rather than delete imperfect material, mark it. RADIX Wiki carries six top-of-article notice banners; any editor can add one to a page, and each renders a fixed label and message that a custom note can override.
| Banner | Use it when |
| Stub | The article is too short to cover its subject and needs expanding. |
| Needs citations | Claims are unsourced or carry [citation needed] tags. |
| May be outdated | Facts have decayed – see freshness. |
| Written like an advertisement | The prose is promotional – see neutral point of view. |
| Needs cleanup | Structure, formatting, or duplication needs work. |
| Conflict of interest | A major contributor may be connected to the subject – see conflict of interest. |
A banner is a request for help, addressed to the next editor. Remove it when the problem it names has been fixed.
